![]() He also received $823,207 in campaign funds from the oil and gas industry. Why? Manchin, personally, makes roughly half a million dollars a year in dividends from coal company stock. At a panel at the American Association of Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) conference on Friday he presented the findings of a paper suggesting that those dramatic claims are probably getting it. According to the latest Gallup Poll, 73% of citizens are in favor of clean energy. They represent Big Pharma, not their constituents. ![]() All are opposed, along with many Republicans, to having Medicare negotiate prices with Big Pharma. Kurt Schrader (D-OR) received $433,178 (Kaiser Health News). Scott Peters (D-CA) received $541,400 since 2013 and Rep. Using a material-based definition drawn from Aristotle, we argue that oligarchy is not inconsistent with democracy that oligarchs need not occupy formal office or conspire together or even engage extensively in politics in order to prevail that great wealth can provide both the resources and. To know more about the government system of Oligarchy and Plutocracy, keep reading till. We explore the possibility that the US political system can usefully be characterized as oligarchic. Robert Menendez (D-CA) received $491,800. The main difference between Oligarchy and Plutocracy is that Oligarchy is a government system ruled by powerful people, who can be unjust or corrupt while Plutocracy is the form of government ruled by wealthy people only. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) received $258,236 from the pharmaceutical industry and Sen. How do these donations correlate with congressional votes?Īlthough 88% of citizens favor allowing the federal government to negotiate for lower prices on medications according to a Kaiser Family Foundation poll, this benefit was eliminated from Biden’s budget proposal. Indirectly, it consists of regulatory frameworks and programs designed to benefit the wealthy (e.g., Trump’s tax cut).Īccording to, it costs over $9.8 million to get elected to the Senate and over $2.3 million to get elected to the House, money that comes mostly from wealthy individuals, corporations, and PACs. Many of their votes seem to “follow the money” which leads to a form of government called an oligarchy or plutocracy which exists when a government is controlled by the wealthy, either directly or indirectly. If you follow the votes of those who “represent” us you will see an interesting pattern. The problem is that, in our current government, we, the people, the common people, are not truly represented. On the surface, it appears that we may be a democratic republic. Since we elect those who represent us, we can be considered a “democratic republic.” So, when Tim Walberg stated that he did not believe in democracy but, “I believe in a republic,” it is noteworthy that he did not say “democratic republic.” Consequently, the leaders need not be elected, which we see in many autocratic “republics” such as the People’s Republic of China and Cuba. The key concept to the word republic is that the leader of the government (or state) is not a hereditary monarch but, rather, someone who is elected or installed. ![]() Perhaps we are a republic, which is a form of government that relies on the representation of the people rather than people representing themselves as in a pure democracy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |